Email conversation
From | Han-Kwang Nienhuys |
To | Me |
Subject | timestamp on browser speed page |
Date | 12 April 2007 00:24 |
Hi,
Your browser speed comparisons page is retired as you say. Could you
consider putting a date somewhere on that page that indicates when the
last update was?
Han-Kwang
From | Me |
To | Han-Kwang Nienhuys |
Subject | Re: timestamp on browser speed page |
Date | 14 April 2007 11:58 |
> Your browser speed comparisons page is retired as you say. Could you
> consider putting a date somewhere on that page that indicates when the
> last update was?
What matters is the browser versions that were tested, not the date. But in
any case:
http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/emails/RockofVictory.html
Mark 'Tarquin' Wilton-Jones - author of http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/
From | Han-Kwang Nienhuys |
To | Me |
Subject | Re: timestamp on browser speed page |
Date | 14 April 2007 12:20 |
> What matters is the browser versions that were tested, not the date. But
Thanks for the info. But I would suggest that you remove phrases such
as "This article is around 2 years old now .. and has been retired"
because it does not provide information about when the statement was
written down (and not updated anymore).
Han-Kwang
From | Me |
To | Han-Kwang Nienhuys |
Subject | Re: timestamp on browser speed page |
Date | 14 April 2007 12:22 |
> But I would suggest that you remove phrases such
> as "This article is around 2 years old now .. and has been retired"
No, that is there to stop people from posting it *yet again* on sites like
slashdot, digg, newspaper sites, etc etc. I tried various other wordings to
ask them to just read and enjoy on their own, but this is the only one that
worked, so it will remain there :)